February 4th, 2010 (07:41 pm)
current mood: aggravated
current song: Rasputin - Turisas
This is actually old news, but it is still an active film project, so reasonably, I'm annoyed by it hearing only of it today. So this is a semi-rant.
What do the movies "The Magnificent Seven", "Battle Beyond the Stars" and Pixar's "A Bug Life" all have in common? They are all remakes (some incredibly loose) of Akira Kurosawa's masterpiece epic, "Seven Samurai" (also based on it was the anime series "Samurai 7", but if I listed that you might have guessed the question). On Saturday I watched the NTSC Criterion DVD (one of the best editions you'd probably get without employing a time-machine) and found the movie still breathtaking, despite having seen the movie several times before. The final battle, set during cinema's most memorable downpour, is unforgettable and magnificently filmed. Not that the film is perfect, but then again, as Pauline Kael observed, few great movies rarely are. In terms of remakes Akira Kurosawa has been blessed. Although I don't consider it a masterpiece, "The Magnificent Seven" is an enjoyable classic Hollywood western. "Battle Beyond the Stars" was more of a Star Wars cash-in / B-movie that, at least, acknowledged the original, and "A Bugs Life" manages to truly stand on its own. "Samurai 7" was also good, but maybe too over-the-top to take seriously. Quite frankly this is where it should have ended. How many times can you have a movie where villagers pay hungry fighters with room and board?
Not enough, apparently. Now there is going to be yet another unnecessary remake of the movie. This time it will be imaginatively titled "The Seven Samurai" (hooboy, definite article!) and George Clooney is attached for a 2011 release. I like George Clooney, only he strikes me a tad too Caucasian for the role. Okay, I'll admit, that was a cheap-shot. I know he wont be playing a samurai in the classical sense. The producers have rationalized a Hollywood cast. Apparently the "samurai" are going to be "private military contractors" (aka mercenaries) who defend a village of farmers somewhere in Asia (Thailand, I think). So, I suppose they'll use the word "samurai" as a loose metaphor, just like the 1998 movie "RONIN" did, though there it was thoughtfully applied through seemingly opaque references to the Japanese legend of the 47 Ronin. Since that movie did it first I can't help but find it old hat here. And, at least, RONIN was an original story. And as Umberto Eco said, the first man to compare his love to a rose was a genius and the second one an idiot. But I digress...
In the original the masterless samurai were paid not with gold but with rice to stave off their hunger, though I have no idea what they'd give them in the remake since paying hungry mercenaries with rice / springrolls, even in the current economic climate, would be stretch. Given the dubious morals of most mercenaries in the real world they'll probably ask for brides to sell on-line, but I suppose that would be too "real" for mass-appeal. No doubt Clooney would play the weary merc who seeks like-minded weary mercs to play heroes and combine a cynicial variation of the cast of the live-action GI Joe movie, then take them to a village who will have a less gray, ambiguous quality than the original village (who considered their saviours more or less a nuisance equal to the bandits they oppose). I suppose the "bandits" will either be Al Queda or drug dealers with John Malkovich leading them in either incarnation. No doubt one of the seven mercs (played by Steve Buscemi) will be some kind of religious nut / crazy Christian because what "serious" movie today doesn't have one? The others will, no doubt, be a sparkling vampire, a werewolf, a rebellious angel, a tall blue guy and Shia LeBoef as the gunman with the broken hand and the itchy trigger-finger. There will also be a full-bodied love story and everyone will find a lady-friend to bed, and no doubt the movie will culminate in a large, explosion ridden finale where bombs drop, houses of reeds fly into the air before disintegrating in great balls of fire and people get machine gunned in slow motion. The movie will probably be two hours long as well, with minimal characterization and lots of additional action scenes that pop up at random places, most of them slow-motion. Then, despite the carnage and death, the villagers will love our non-Thai heroes and invite them to stay, which they wont and they'll ride off into the sunset in their blood-money soaked Hummers while Linkin Park sings over the credits, assuming they don't go with a Care Bear ending (don't even go there).
Well, that is the worst-case scenario. Not all remakes are necessarily bad - some are even better than the originals (like the Humphrey Bogart movie, "The Maltese Falcon", which was actually the second remake) so, until we know more, we have to give them the benefit of the doubt. If the filmmakers try to make something poignant or thoughtful they could actually make a good movie. Seven Samurai praised the samurai code (Bushido) while condemning the caste-based, conformity-praising society that spawned it. In a modern setting the movie can be made to criticize the questionable practices of the world's military industrial complex as well as those of private para-military corporations, and if they try to do something like that then I may be on-board as a viewer.
But what are the chances of THAT happening?